K
Signed, 1/10
KRNL
A signed binary scored 1/10, a domain with an "Official" title, and a support thread about a blocked download.
01
The archived listing
A GitHub repository titled "Executor-API-Docs" contains a table of executors and their documentation status. The row for Electron reads: "Electron | Official, Archived" .
"Archived" is a status label. It means the documentation or the project it refers to is no longer actively maintained in that list. It does not mean the executable is discontinued, and it does not mean the project is safe or unsafe. It means the record itself is marked as not current. The repository does not provide a date for when Electron was archived, a version number, or a source URL.
02
The installation instruction
A Gamer Tweak guide titled "How To Install Electron Executor For Roblox" contains a step that is worth quoting directly: "After that, disable your Windows Security and any active Antivirus software on your system" .
The guide also warns that users should not click on advertisements while downloading Electron, because "Those ads can be malicious and cause harm to your PC" . It mentions that the executor "might ask for a Key" and that the key can be obtained online. The guide is dated 2023, which means it is three years old at the time of this review. It describes an installation process, not a security audit.
03
The marketing description
Market.dev contains a description of Electron that reads: "Electron Executor is a high-powered Roblox script executor that combines lightning-fast script injection with multi-API support and a preloaded script library. Its user-friendly design and robust anti-ban measures make it a trusted choice for scripters" .
This is marketing copy. It does not name a version, a release date, a developer, or a source URL. It claims "robust anti-ban measures" without providing a basis for the claim. It is a description of what the product is supposed to be, not a record of what it does.
04
What is missing
No ScriptBunker, ScriptBlox, or Rscripts entry for Electron was found in the sources reviewed here. There is no published sUNC score, no version number from a tracker, and no detection flag. The sUNC test suite exists specifically to measure whether functions work as intended, rather than being spoofed . Without a tracker entry, there is no independent sUNC measurement for Electron to compare against the marketing description.
No Triage sample, Gridinsoft domain scan, or Microsoft Q&A thread for Electron was found in the sources reviewed here. The record consists of an archived listing, a three-year-old installation guide, and a marketing paragraph. None of those is a measurement of the current binary.
Sources: GitHub Executor-API-Docs · Gamer Tweak installation guide · Market.dev description · sUNC documentation . The record is an archived listing and an installation instruction, not a measurement.
Why an archived listing is not a current status
The GitHub table that tags Electron as "Archived" is a list of API documentation links . It records the state of a link, not the state of a binary. A project can be archived in a documentation list while the executable continues to circulate, or while the project is abandoned entirely. The label does not distinguish between those cases.
The absence of a tracker entry is a separate gap. Trackers like ScriptBunker and ScriptBlox run the sUNC suite and publish results. The sUNC documentation explicitly notes that the suite exists because executors have historically faked their environments to pass older tests . Without a tracker entry, there is no independent measurement of whether Electron's functions work as claimed. The marketing description on Market.dev calls it "high-powered" and "trusted" , but those are adjectives, not measurements.
The installation guide is the most specific record in this profile, and it is also the oldest. A 2023 instruction to disable antivirus before installing describes a practice, not a security property. The practice may have been necessary for the software to run. It does not make the software safe, and it does not make it malicious. It describes an operational requirement.
What the "disable antivirus" instruction actually means
An installation guide that tells users to disable Windows Security and antivirus software is describing a conflict between the software and the operating system's security features . That conflict can have several causes: the installer may be unsigned, it may use packers or obfuscation that trigger heuristics, or it may perform actions that security software flags as risky.
The instruction does not resolve which of those causes applies to Electron. It records that, according to a 2023 guide, the software did not install cleanly on a default Windows configuration. Whether that is still true in 2026 is not documented in the sources reviewed here.
The record, with its gaps marked
| Attribute | Value | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listing status | Official, Archived | GitHub | Recorded |
| Installation step | Disable antivirus | Gamer Tweak | Instruction, 2023 |
| Marketing claim | "High-powered", "trusted" | Market.dev | Description |
| sUNC | — | — | Unknown |
| Version | — | — | Unknown |
| Detection | — | — | Unknown |
| Official source | — | — | Unknown |
"Recorded" means the source published the value. "Instruction" means the source described a process. "Unknown" means no source was found at review time. None of these is a safety rating.
What this page does not claim
- This page does not claim Electron is malware. No sandbox score, domain scan, or malware analysis for Electron was found in the sources reviewed here.
- This page does not claim Electron is safe. No tracker entry, sUNC measurement, or independent audit was found.
- This page does not claim the "Archived" label means Electron is discontinued. It means the documentation listing is marked as not current . The executable may still circulate.
- This page does not claim the 2023 installation guide describes the current state of Electron. It is a three-year-old instruction , and no current source was found to compare it against.
Electron questions, answered with the gaps intact
What does the "Archived" label mean?
It means a GitHub list of executor API documentation marks the Electron entry as not current . It does not mean the executable is discontinued, and it does not mean it is unsafe. It means the documentation record itself is not active.
Why does the installation guide tell users to disable antivirus?
The 2023 guide instructs users to "disable your Windows Security and any active Antivirus software" before installing . That is an instruction, not a security recommendation. It describes a conflict between the software and Windows security features, without resolving what causes the conflict.
Is there an sUNC score for Electron?
No. No ScriptBunker, ScriptBlox, or Rscripts entry for Electron was found in the sources reviewed here. The sUNC suite exists to measure function coverage independently . Without a tracker entry, there is no such measurement for Electron.
Is Electron available for Android?
The Market.dev description says Electron is "currently available safely for Windows" and "not officially available for Android users" . That is a marketing claim, not a verified record. No independent source confirms it.
Can I download Electron from this page?
Not yet. No verified official source was found. The Download button is a placeholder. When you have a confirmed source and choose to link it, replace the href. Until then, this page serves no file.
Why does this page look different from KRNL's?
Because KRNL had a signed binary, a domain with an "Official" title, and a support thread. Electron has an archived listing, a three-year-old installation guide, and a marketing paragraph. The layout uses layers to separate those records, because none of them is a measurement of the current binary.